20号的你问我答：印度豹的炮盾是纸糊的

SOS-发动机

　　- there is no special MM mechanism to equalize the number of TD's in both team
　　不会有特殊的分房机制来保证每边TD数量相同
　　- despite the fact the VK2801 and Aufklärungspanzer Panther have similiar turrets (stat-wise they are identical), those aren't shared (not a bug) as turrets are never shared between tanks, it's a game decision
　　尽管侦查豹和2801用同一个炮塔，不过它们的炮塔并不通用——————这是游戏的一环，不爽不要玩。
　　- apparently, the 8.5 patch introduced longer waiting times between battles, it will be investigated
　　毛子发现8.5导致玩家的排队时间变长了，毛子正在调查这个问题。
　　- apparently, if you quit a battle and change server while the tank is still locked, on 2nd server it will be available (and the battle result won't be counted in). After relogging though, the battle result will display properly (it won't disappear)
　　很明显，当你退出战场，在那一句尚未结束的时候换区，依然能登上第二个区，不过战绩可能出现对不上号的情况。不过重新登录之后，战绩又能恢复正常了
　　- the Indienpanzer mantlet is apparently very fragile
　　印度豹的炮盾是纸糊的（所以别想卖头了）
　　- M55's amount of 203mm ammo carried (historically 10 pieces) will most likely be increased in WoT
　　M55（美系新火炮）的载弹量（历史上是10发203MM炮弹）在游戏中会变多的
　　- the adrenaline rush perk mechanics have not been changed in 8.5
　　8.5不改变“爆发装填”的机制
　　来自Ensign的Q&A：
　　Q: I've heard about Object 416, which sounds like it would be a Russian version of the Chinese 121 or WZ 120, but nothing else. Any info would be much appreciated, even if it is just speculation at this point.
　　我听说毛子有一种叫做Obj416的车子，据说是毛子版的121和WZ-120，不过除此之外其他资料未知。你能告诉我一点信息么，哪怕只是推测出来的也好啊
　　A: On the contrary, the 416 was a unique snowflake in a world of T-54 clones. For one, the tank features a rear turret, which looks more like an IS-8 one than a T-54 one. The armour is very weak, 110 mm in the front turret, 70 mm in the front hull. It's not even sloped that much. With a D-10T like gun (4.5 calibers longer, so it might get more than 175 mm of penetration), this is like a T-34-1 with worse armour and less gun depression. At least the driver is in the turret, along with all other crew members, so every shot to the hull won't kill him. This sounds like it's either going to be a tier 7 or a very, very painful tier 8.
　　相反的，Obj416是众多T-54及其变形车中一个很特殊的车子。它的炮塔不一样，看上去更像是IS-8的而不是T-54的。它的装甲也相当贫弱。炮塔前装甲只有110MM，车体只有70MM，而且没有什么角度。安装一门类似于D-10T的炮（长径比增加了4.5，所以穿深将会大于175）。这辆车更像是T-34-1的装甲、俯角弱化版。此外呢，它的驾驶员以及其他成员位于炮塔，这样对车体的攻击很难将其杀死。这辆车感觉撑死就是7级车，当8级车的话会很蛋疼的

SOS-发动机

　　Q: What did the "Y" stand for in SU-100Y? Also, is it "SU-100Y" or "SU-100-Y"?
　　Su-100Y名字里的“”Y“有什么含义么？？”还有，它的名字是Su-100Y还是Su-100-Y??
　　A: The Y doesn't stand for anything. There were three T-100 proposals to answer the requirement for a fully armoured bunker buster: T-100X, T-100Y, and T-100Z. SU-100Y is based on the second one, hence the name. As for the proper form, Soviet numeric indexes are dashed (ISU-122-3), but letter indexes are not (ISU-122BM). However, since in this case the index replaces a number, I would say that the more proper way of saying it would be SU-100-Y.
　　Y毫无意义，什么都不代表。 历史上有3辆T-100为了提高对工事的破坏能力而进行了改装，分别是T-100X，T-100Y，T-100Z。Su-100Y就是由T-100Y演变而来的，名字也是因此而来的。至于说哪种说法更合适？？ 苏联放弃了数字命名法（Isu-122-3），但是字母命名法并没有放弃（ISU-122BM），然而，尽管字母命名法代替了数字命名法，不过我觉得“Su-100-Y”这个说法还是更好一些
　　Q: How effective were Russian artillery pieces (such as SU-18, SU-26 and SU-5) throughout WW2? They seem to have a lower range than their counterparts in other nations - did this impact their effectiveness?
　　苏联那些自行火炮（Su-18 Su-26 Su-5）在2战中有什么作用么？？？ 他们看上去比其他国家火炮射程要短得多啊———他们起到过什么作用么？？
　　A: SU-18 was never built, since the T-18 chassis was deemed too weak for a 76.2 mm gun. SU-26 also had a 76.2 mm gun. Considering that only 12 were built they didn't have very much impact on any battles. As for SU-5, it was accepted by the army, but only 15 were built With such few numbers, it is hard to judge its combat effectiveness compared to SPGs like the SU-122, which numbered in the hundreds.
　　As for range, it was pretty low. Keep in mind that SU-5 was developed in the early 30s, and SU-26 got a gun that was even older than that. By the time WWII came around, Soviet artillery could easily shoot at twice the range of these guns.
　　Su-18从来没投产过————T-18（MS-1）的底盘无法承载76.2MM的火炮。Su-26同样只有76.2MM火炮，他只生产了12门————根本不能影响改变战局。至于SU-5么，军方虽然采用了这种火炮，不过它也只生产了15辆。由于数量实在是太少了，所以和产量成百的Su-122相比，评价他们在战争中的左右是很难的事。
　　至于说射程么，十分短。要注意，Su-5是30年代早期开发出来的东西，SU-26上面的炮甚至是更古董的玩意。当2战爆发时，苏{已过滤}炮射程已经是它们射程的2倍多了。
　　Q: Is there an SU-26 in a museum somewhere (either a version as in game or some modded version)?
　　有哪个博物馆收藏Su-26么？？
　　A: All SU-26es have been lost in battle by 1944.
　　很遗憾，所有的Su-26在1944年的战斗中消失了。