22号Q&A：8.9没有T-44-85且穿深要BUFF

SOS-真谛

　　- SerB states that WoT won’t be transferred to a new game engine, it would increase the costs and reduce the speed of development

　　SerB:嘛，WOT是不会更换引擎的，因为，这会增加预算，再一个，这影响了我们的车辆（pian）补完（qian）计划

　　- there has been a project to put a gun more powerful than the BL-9 on IS-3: the D-83

　　知道么？IS-3有过安装D-83（比Bl-⑨威力更大的炮）的计划

　　- a high power 122mm gun was tested on an IS-2 (more powerful than the D-25)

　　IS-2曾经安装过比D-25威力更大的122炮的试验车

　　- a non-penetrating HE explosion (on armor) can also set an engine on fire (modules get damaged even if the shell doesn’t penetrate)

　　知道么，未穿透的HE都有可能把发动机打着火（未穿透的炮弹也可能打坏零件）

　　- repair kit doesn’t fix only the equipment function, but also its hitpoints

　　修理箱不仅能让（已损坏的）零件恢复正常，还能恢复零件的HP

　　- for now the devs haven’t had time to discuss the perk/skill rebalance issues

　　毛子暂时还没时间讨论有关技能平衡的问题

　　- Q: “How high will be the maximum speed of the new tier 10 French heavy without autoloader?” A: “As high as I implement it”

　　毛子，毛子，法国2线HT顶级车的急速是？？SerB： “我说是多少就是多少”

　　- Q: “I’d like to see Soviet tanks with autoloaders, why aren’t there any?” A:”Because the Soviets didn’t bother with autoloaders”

　　毛子，毛子，我想看看苏联的弹夹车，为什么你们不出呢？ SerB：因为苏联有亲爹之力，不需要弹夹这种天顶星科技

　　- SerB states that oscillating turrets and autoloaders are so good in the game, because reliability does not play a role in WoT. This is intentional, as the developers do not want the player to “fight their own tank”, lower real life reliability of components is sometimes implemented as lower amount of module hitpoints for example

　　SerB：摇摆炮塔，自动装弹机这些玩意出现在游戏中，很好啊，因为游戏中不用考虑设备的可靠性——这是毛子有意为之的，因为毛子并不想让玩家和自己的车子对抗。在现实中不太可靠的零件，在游戏中则体现为“较少的HP”

　　- the fact you disable the encounter and assault modes has no influence on map selection

　　关闭攻防，夺旗并不会影响地图的选择

　　- Soviet autocannon Sh-37 penetration values were taken from te♂sts conducted under 60 degrees and not 90 degrees, because with the 90 degrees pen the gun would be way too overpowered

　　苏联的SH-37自动炮的穿深是以靶板呈60度时测出的穿深值，而非90度。因为以90度的话，这就太变态了

SOS-真谛

　　- based on previous questions, a player asks where else is the penetration lower than historical, SerB replies that it’s like that with many premium shells for example

　　紧接着上一个问题，有人问毛子，是不是还有别的穿深比历史数据要低的情况，SerB表示很多金币弹都是这个样子

　　- SerB states that while the hull drawings for IS-3 on the internet are fully adequate, the drawings of the turret armor are quite complicated and that’s why they haven’t been laid out

　　SerB：网上流传的IS-3的车体图纸是比较精确的，至于炮塔装甲分布图么……就比较令人费解了，这就是为什么它们没有被公布的原因

　　- 122mm U-11 was not proposed for KV-2, it’s in the game as a stock gun for balance reasons

　　基于游戏平衡的考量，KV-2的白板炮不可能是122MM U-11喷子炮

　　- SerB states that even though there is a new trend on RU server (players intentionally playing bad to have worst stats possible), the thing that will be punished will be these players’ individual transgressions, not the trend as a whole

　　SerB表示最近毛子服风气不好，大家有意打出坏战绩，毛子会惩罚这些玩家的，毛子并不提倡这种行为

　　- at this moment, it is not planned for shells to cause weak armor zones (SS: as in, a shell damages armor and the spot will be easier to penetrate), apparently this was planed until closed testing, it’s possible it might appear in the future, but SerB states the problem with this would be player perception (“how the hell did they penetrate that spot with a weak gun”)

　　至少现在是不会出现什么“装甲疲劳”这种设定的，不过毛子已经测试过了，未来可能有。但是SerB表示：“这会让玩家带来困惑的————’这杆烧火棍就能打穿我！！！‘“

　　- there will be no “special” tank destroyer vehicle usable only in 7/42

　　没有专门为 7/42联队而设的TD

　　- it’s possible the Panther II from Patton museum (SS: Panther II hull with Panther Ausf.G turret) will make it to the game, perhaps as an optional hull

　　巴顿博物馆那辆黑豹2（黑豹2的车身+豹G的炮塔）有可能以”可选车体“的身份出现在游戏里

　　- SerB and Storm confirm that T-44-85 will NOT be in 8.9, it’s too weak and requires more testing, apparently the penetration will be buffed

　　SerB，Storm表示8.9没有T-44-85，它浑身都充满了弱者的气息————穿深要buff