战舰世界问答：3/11Q&A 该如何平衡美国

SOSlalalala

内容摘要：战舰世界问答：3/11Q&A 该如何平衡美国...

　　Would Prinz Heinrich make a better premium?

　　海因里希亲王号适不适合当金币船?

　　This armored cruiser too weak for Tier II battleship and too strong for Tier II cruiser. Premium - that's possible.

　　嘛，这条装甲巡洋舰当2级战列舰太弱，当2级巡洋舰又太强。嗯，金币船，很有可能啊

　　Well we know about these ones(这个问题篇幅太长，回答部分用下划线标记)

　　下面是已知的船

　　USN美帝

　　PG Erie,伊利湖号

　　Carriers航母

　　CV Essex,埃塞克斯级 CVL Independence 独立级

　　Battleships战列舰

　　BB New Mexico 新墨西哥级, BB North Carolina 北卡罗来纳级, BB Iowa 衣阿华级

　　Cruisers巡洋舰

　　CA New Orleans 新奥尔良级, CA Baltimore巴尔的摩级 CA Des Moines得梅因级, , CA Northampton北安普顿级 CL Chester切斯特级(轻巡)

　　Destroyers驱逐舰

　　DD Fletcher弗莱彻级 DD Smith史密斯级

　　IJN日本

　　CL Katori 香取(轻型)

　　Carriers航母

　　CV Zuikaku瑞鹤(翔鹤的存在感好低), CV Akagi赤城

　　Battleships战列舰

　　BB Nagato长门型, BB Fuso扶桑型, BB Yamato大和型, BC Amagi天城型

　　Cruisers巡洋舰

　　CA Aoba青叶型, CA Takao,高雄型

　　Destroyers驱逐舰

　　DD Kagero阳炎型, DD Minekaze 峰风型

　　Could you tell us any more?

　　嘛，能再跟我们说几个怎么样?

　　USN - CV Lexington, Langley, BB Michigan, Colorado, CL Omaha

　　IJN - CV Hosho, DD Isokaze

　　美帝——航母:列克星敦级 兰利号 战列舰:密歇根号 科罗拉多级 轻巡：奥马哈级

　　日本——航母：凤翔号 驱逐舰：矶风型

　　Previous you mentioned that a tier 4 BC for Japan was a preliminary of Kongo, could you tell us some information about it?

　　嘛，敬爱的工作人猿，你之前说日系那个4级的战巡是金刚的前身，能说说具体细节么?

　　2*5*305mm, armour is similar to Kongo.

　　5座2联装305炮，装甲和金刚类似

SOSlalalala

　　1. In WOWS, will Shell penetration on side and deck calculated differently or calculated as whole?

　　嘛，炮弹穿透船舷和甲板的计算方式是一样么?

　　Armor penetration depends on the thickness of armor, shell type and trajectory. No matter, side or deck armor - matter the point of impact and the angle of incidence. So... :)

　　穿甲是取决于装甲的厚度，弹种和弹道。所以说，船舷和甲板是没有差别的，只有入射角的差别而已

　　2 Any possible tier for

　　Higara design 1930

　　Fujimoto design 1930

　　CL Tone?

　　能说说这几条船都是几级船么?

　　1.平贺1930设计方案

　　2.藤本1930设计方案

　　3.利根型

　　We know about this projects, but it's not at release Japan ship tree. CL Tone probably will be Tier IX in second Japan cruiser line.

        你说的这些我们都知道，不过在先行的科技树里面没有，利根型可能是日系巡洋舰2线的⑨级船吧

　　3.Just for question, does WG consider about Agano-kai and CL No.815 design?

　　一个问题，你们考虑过阿贺野改和第815号轻巡设计方案么?

　　Not in the tree now.

　　至少目前不在科技树里面

　　4. For aircraft, is it possible to fill CV with only one type of aircraft (something like WOT's shell refill) or there will me minimum requirement of type of aircraft to fill?

　　航母是不是可以只带某一种飞机出门(就像WOT的炮弹那样)，还是说，每种飞机都有一个最低搭载量

　　Now we are planning one squadron of each type of aircraft as minimal requirements.

　　我们现在的计划是每种飞机最少得带一个中队

　　5. Would AA fire in WOWS is similar to WOWP's AA fire or it will be more dense?

　　游戏中的防空火力会像WOWP那样，还是更密集?

　　That depends on ship. AA-cruisers or latest carriers will have very dense AA defence.

　　那得看你是什么穿，防空巡洋舰和新型航母有非常密集的防空火力

　　10. For IJN T10 CV No.111, will it have similar to Shinano's layout or does it has somewhat significant difference? (structure, flight deck, etc...)

　　那个啥，日本10级航母CV111，布局是不是和信浓差不多，还是有什么特别之处?

　　Firstly, number of carried planes. And some else things.

　　首先，搭载量不同，当然，还有其他差别(等于没说)

　　12. Will there be a gold torpedo?

　　有金币鱼雷么?

　　That's possible.

　　有此可能

SOSlalalala

　　13. Will USN's SHS be a gold shell or normal shell or both?

　　美帝的SHS炮塔是金币弹还是银币弹还是说二者均有

　　Not clear at this moment. Both variants are possible.

　　现在情况不明，以上情况均有

　　14. If a shell penetrates barbet or turret, will there be a possibility to hit ammorack?

　　如果炮弹打穿了炮塔，会不会打爆弹药架啊

　　Yes.

　　当然

　　15. Will the damage hit on vital part and non-vital part be same?

　　话说打中要害部位和非要害部位的伤害是不是一样的?

　　Calculation shell damage on vital and non-vital part are making the same, but in vital part a shell may make a critical hit.

　　伤害是一样的，不过打中要害部位的炮弹容易出高伤

　　16. Will there be a torpedo net as equipment?

　　那啥，防雷网，会有这东西么?

　　Most likely no

　　很可能没有

　　17. Will CV have weaker hp than most of the ships (similar to arty)?

　　航母的HP是不是比同级船低(就像WOT的火炮一样)

　　No. Why?

　　不，为什么要这样

　　18. Will IJN BB/CA able to fire Type 3 shell for AA?

　　日本的战列舰，重巡能不能打三式弹对空啊

　　.This is a very interesting feature for IJN :) So, that's possible, but a difficult to implement.

　　嘛，这个是日系的一大特色，当然有可能，不过要实现这个有点难

　　19. Will the weather affect ships's balance/accuracy?

　　天气会不会影响船的精度和平衡?

　　And visibility too.

        (当然)也会影响能见度

　　20.

　　Any possibility of early Soryu design equipped with 2 8" turret?

　　如图所示，有没有可能出现这种装有2门8寸炮的早期型苍龙?

　　Now we don't plan Soryu with 2*8" turrent.

　　暂时没这计划

　　1. Possbile Collaboration with KanColle in future like WoT X Girls und Panzers? I know might be too early to think about it though :)

　　话说WOWS会不会和舰娘联动，就像WOT和少女与战车一样————虽然我知道这个问题问的时间太早了

　　Theoretically possible :)

　　理论上可以有(话说那帮真·美洲提督传教成功啊，Q&A君都知道舰娘了)

　　2. Any Possibilty to modify ourship's sub-systems and armor for some personalities into our ships? ships have much more personality than tanks and planes and I hope WG can capture the sense of ownership/belonging towards a ship rather than 'it is just a clone'

　　我们能不能个性化改造我们的船，在船上加装额外装甲，较之于坦克，舰船的个性化程度更高。我希望毛子允许我们这样，我们不希望看见千篇一律的船

　　That's quite difficult feature. We don't have a final decision now.

　　这个有难度，我们还没做出最终决定

　　How are USN(and any other) cruisers that lack torpedo launchers balanced with ones that do?

　　你们该如何平衡美国(以及其他国家)那些没几个鱼雷发射器的巡洋舰?

　　Usually torpedo cruisers are lighter armored and worse armed then non-torpedo cruisers at same tier.

　　一般而言，雷巡是轻装甲，比同级巡洋舰的装甲要薄

         编辑：人偶、|皮